Categories
Beyond

CCPA fines 9 platforms over deceptive dark patterns

Online shopping may feel quick and convenient, but the choices presented on a screen are not always as straightforward as they appear. The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has now tightened its scrutiny of such practices, penalising nine digital platforms for using so-called dark patterns that can influence or manipulate consumer decisions.

The penalties, totalling ₹20 lakh, cover companies operating across sectors including quick commerce, e-commerce, aviation, education, online pharmacy and cybersecurity.

The action has brought familiar names such as Zepto, IndiGo, BookMyShow, FirstCry, Physics Wallah and SpiceJet under the consumer watchdog’s spotlight.

Dark patterns are design techniques used on websites and apps that can push consumers towards choices they may not otherwise make. They can take the form of hidden charges, pre-selected options, misleading discounts, difficult cancellation processes or messages designed to create pressure.

The issue has become increasingly important as more Indians shop, book travel, subscribe to services and make payments online.

One of the largest penalties in the latest action was imposed on Zepto, which was fined ₹7 lakh. The quick-commerce platform was found to have displayed lower product prices before adding handling charges later in the checkout process. It also allegedly added a membership option to the basket automatically.

Such practices fall under categories known as drip pricing and basket sneaking.

Drip pricing occurs when the actual cost of a product or service is revealed only gradually, often towards the end of a transaction. Basket sneaking refers to adding products, services or other paid options to a consumer’s cart without clear consent.

For a customer ordering a few everyday items, the difference may appear small. But across millions of online transactions, such additional charges can have a significant impact on consumer spending.

BookMyShow was also penalised over a similar concern. The platform had a pre-selected ₹1 contribution towards its BookASmile initiative. Consumers could remove the contribution, but it was already selected unless they actively opted out.

The regulator treated this as basket sneaking, highlighting a larger concern: consumers should not have to notice and undo an unwanted choice before completing a purchase.

In the aviation sector, IndiGo and SpiceJet were among the platforms facing CCPA action. Flight bookings can involve several additional services and charges, making transparency particularly important for consumers comparing ticket prices.

The CCPA’s action reflects concerns that the price initially displayed to a traveller may not always represent the final amount payable after optional services, fees or other additions are included.

Other companies facing penalties include FirstCry, Physics Wallah, PharmEasy, McAfee and Anuj Jindal.

Physics Wallah was penalised over practices involving basket sneaking, confirm shaming and forced action. Confirm shaming refers to language or design that makes consumers feel guilty or irresponsible for refusing an offer. Forced action occurs when users are required to complete an unwanted step before accessing a product or service.

FirstCry was fined ₹2 lakh, while Anuj Jindal faced a ₹3 lakh penalty. PharmEasy, McAfee and SpiceJet were each fined ₹1 lakh.

The latest action comes under the Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns, 2023, introduced to address deceptive practices in India’s rapidly expanding digital marketplace.

The guidelines identify 13 categories of dark patterns. These include false urgency, basket sneaking, confirm shaming, forced action, subscription traps, interface interference, bait and switch, drip pricing, disguised advertisements, nagging and trick questions, among others.

A false urgency message, for example, could tell users that only a few products remain in stock or that an offer will expire within minutes, creating pressure to purchase immediately.

A subscription trap can make it easy to sign up for a service while making cancellation unnecessarily difficult.

The CCPA’s intervention signals that digital consumer protection is moving beyond traditional concerns such as misleading advertisements and defective products. Regulators are increasingly examining the design of digital interfaces themselves.

In June 2025, the CCPA had advised e-commerce platforms to conduct self-audits to identify and remove dark patterns from their websites and applications. Companies were asked to examine their digital interfaces and submit declarations regarding compliance.

The latest penalties suggest that regulators are now moving from warnings and awareness to stronger enforcement.

For consumers, the message is equally practical: a discount displayed on an app may not always be the final price, and a pre-selected option should never be mistaken for a mandatory one.

Consumers are increasingly making decisions within seconds — clicking “buy now”, accepting a subscription or completing a payment without examining every line of a transaction. Dark patterns exploit precisely that behaviour.

For digital businesses, the action is a warning that user experience cannot come at the cost of transparency. Convenience, speed and attractive interfaces may draw customers in, but hidden charges and manipulative design can undermine trust.

 

Categories
Beyond

CCPA penalises Storia, Mrs Bector over product claims

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has imposed penalties of ₹1 lakh each on Storia Foods and Mrs Bector Food Specialities for allegedly making misleading claims about their products. The action comes as regulators tighten scrutiny of advertising practices and seek greater transparency for consumers.

According to the consumer watchdog, both companies promoted certain products using “100%” claims that could potentially mislead consumers regarding the nature, composition or quality of the products. The CCPA observed that such claims may create an impression that products are entirely natural or free from additives, even when packaging disclosures indicate otherwise.

The authority said advertisements must provide accurate and complete information so that consumers can make informed purchasing decisions. It noted that broad claims such as “100%” should be backed by clear evidence and should not exaggerate product attributes in a manner that could influence consumer behaviour unfairly.

As part of its order, the CCPA directed the companies to discontinue or modify the disputed advertisements and ensure future promotional material complies with consumer protection guidelines. The regulator also instructed them to issue corrective disclosures to address concerns arising from the advertising claims.

The case highlights the increasing focus on marketing practices in India’s fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector. In recent years, regulators have intensified efforts to curb misleading advertisements, particularly those involving health, nutrition and product purity claims. Authorities believe consumers should not be left with inaccurate impressions because of promotional language that lacks adequate clarification.

Consumer rights advocates welcomed the move, arguing that stricter enforcement helps improve accountability and encourages responsible advertising. They say shoppers often rely on packaging and advertisements while making purchasing decisions, making transparency essential.

For companies, the order serves as a reminder that marketing messages must be supported by verifiable facts and presented in a manner that does not create confusion. Industry experts expect regulators to continue monitoring advertising claims across sectors as consumer awareness grows.

Also Read: Windows users to see Copilot added automatically soon

Categories
Beyond

CCPA bans extra charges in restaurant bills

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has prohibited hotels and restaurants from adding extra charges such as LPG fees, gas surcharges, or fuel-related costs to customer bills, calling the practice unfair and misleading.

The authority clarified that customers should only be charged the price displayed on the menu along with applicable taxes. Any additional amount imposed under separate headings, such as fuel recovery or gas charges, will be treated as a violation of consumer protection rules.

The directive follows a rise in complaints from consumers who found unexpected charges added to their bills while dining out. Many establishments were reportedly including fees labeled as “LPG charges” or “fuel surcharge,” increasing the final payable amount without prior transparency.

According to the CCPA, operational expenses like cooking gas, electricity, and other overheads are part of a business’s cost structure. These must already be factored into menu pricing and cannot be passed on to customers as separate line items. The regulator stressed that such practices distort pricing and mislead consumers.

The authority also observed that some restaurants were using alternative names for these charges in an attempt to bypass existing norms, including guidelines around service charges. It made it clear that simply renaming such fees does not make them permissible under the law.

Warning of strict enforcement, the CCPA said it will monitor compliance closely and take action against establishments that continue to impose such charges. Penalties may be applied under provisions of consumer protection law for engaging in unfair trade practices.

Consumers have been encouraged to remain vigilant and check their bills carefully. If any unauthorized charges are found, they can request removal of the fee. In cases where businesses refuse to comply, customers can file complaints through official consumer grievance platforms.

Also Read: Salesforce freezes senior executives’ pay, boosts bonuses

Categories
Beyond

CCPA fines baby food brand ₹8 lakh

India’s consumer watchdog has imposed a ₹8 lakh fine on a baby food company for making misleading claims that infants can start crawling as early as three months old. The penalty was issued by the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) under rules aimed at stopping deceptive advertising that could mislead caregivers.

The CCPA found that promotional materials from the brand suggested that babies would begin crawling at three months if they consumed its product. This claim was judged to be unrealistic and not supported by scientific evidence. Experts agree that infants typically begin crawling between 6 and 10 months, and presenting an earlier age as a guaranteed outcome could mislead parents and set unhealthy expectations.

In its ruling, the CCPA noted that such claims not only misrepresent child development milestones but also exploit parental concerns about early growth and progress. The regulator said the advertisement content falls under unfair trade practices, which are prohibited under India’s consumer protection laws.

The fine of ₹8 lakh reflects the seriousness with which the regulator viewed the issue, both because it targeted a vulnerable group, infants, and because it could influence purchasing decisions of parents and caregivers. The CCPA has increasingly focused on advertisements that make unsubstantiated health and development claims about children’s products, emphasizing the need for accuracy and responsibility in marketing.

Officials from the CCPA said companies must ensure that all claims about health, growth, and development are backed by credible scientific studies and expert consensus before they are included in marketing. They warned that similar penalties could follow for other companies that make exaggerated or unverified claims in their advertising.

Consumer advocates welcomed the decision, saying it sends a strong message to firms to avoid sensational or exaggerated marketing tactics. They pointed out that parents rely heavily on product information when making decisions about infant nutrition and care, and misleading claims can lead to confusion or poor choices.

The CCPA’s action is part of a broader regulatory push to protect consumers, especially vulnerable groups like children, from deceptive advertising.

Also Read: Dynamatic Technologies joins Hutchinson to boost India’s aerospace manufacturing